Evaluation of Radiopacity of Endosequence Bio-ceramic Sealer and AH Plus by Digital Radiography

Radiopacity of Endosequence Bio-ceramic Sealer and AH Plus by Digital Radiography

Authors

  • Saima Qureshi Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
  • Feroze Ali Kalhoro Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan
  • Haresh Oad McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • Muhammad Ali Panhwar Department of Community Dentistry, Muhammad Dental College, Mirpurkhas, Pakistan
  • Faryal Manzoor Department of Community Dentistry, Muhammad Dental College, Mirpurkhas, Pakistan
  • Fahad Aslam Shujrah Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i8.3785

Keywords:

AH Plus, BC Sealer, Endodontic Sealers, Radiography

Abstract

Radiopacity is a key requirement for endodontic sealers to allow radiographic distinction between obturation material and surrounding tooth structures. American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and American Dental Association (ADA) mandate a minimum of 3 millimetres of aluminium (mm Al). Objectives: To compare, in vitro, the radiopacity of Endo-Sequence BC Sealer versus AH Plus using digital radiography on extracted human single-rooted teeth. Methods: An experimental in vitro study was conducted at the Department of Operative Dentistry, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro. A total of 60 single‑rooted teeth were selected using a non-probability convenience sampling method and allocated into two groups (n=30 each) without randomization. Care was taken to ensure that the two groups were comparable in terms of tooth type and root morphology and obturated with gutta-percha plus either Endosequence BC or AH Plus. After 7 days at 37°C/100 % humidity, radiopacity was expressed as millimetres of aluminium (mm Al). Data were compared using an independent-samples t-test (α = 0.05). Results: The sample analyzed consisted of 60 samples (30 samples per group). AH Plus demonstrated significantly higher radiopacity (6.94 ± 0.46 mm Al) compared to Endosequence BC (3.83 ± 0.35 mm Al). The confidence intervals were not overlapping (AH Plus: 6.77 7.10 mm Al; Endosequence BC: 3.71 ± 3.96 mm Al). The difference was statistically very significant (p<0.01). Conclusions: AH Plus demonstrated significantly higher and more consistent radiopacity than Endosequence BC, offering superior radiographic contrast and a wider safety margin for clinical detection of obturation quality.

References

Juntha S, Tungsawat P, Wongwatanasanti N, Suksaphar W, Lertnantapanya S. Evaluation of Setting Time, Flowability, Film Thickness, and Radiopacity of Experimental Monocalcium Silicate‐Based Root Canal Sealers. International Journal of Dentistry. 2024; 2024(1): 8541653. doi: 10.1155/2024/8541653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8541653

Kapralos V, Camilleri J, Koutroulis A, Valen H, Ørstavik D, Sunde PT. Endodontic Sealers After Exposure to Chlorhexidine Digluconate: An Assessment of Physicochemical Properties. Dental Materials. 2024 Mar; 40(3): 420-30. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.11.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.11.019

Dsouza TS, Shetty A, Pais KP, Chikkanna M, Almutairi FH, Alharbi YA et al. Evaluation of the Effect of Nanosilver and Bismuth oxide on the Radiopacity of a Novel Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealer: An In vitro Study. Journal of Medical Physics. 2024 Oct; 49(4): 642-7. doi: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_158_24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_158_24

Limongi PB, Amaral AP, Pelegrine RA, Da Silveira Bueno CE, Kato AS, De Martin AS et al. Removal of Obturation Material from Root Canals Using a Combination of Reciprocal Instrumentation and Different Final Irrigation Techniques. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2020; 15(3): 147.

Park SY, Kang MK, Choi HW, Shon WJ. Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Filling Debris and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy Using Various Root Canal Activation Systems During Endodontic Retreatment. Medicina. 2020 Nov; 56(11): 615. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56110615

Bilvinaite G, Drukteinis S, Brukiene V, Rajasekharan S. Immediate and Long-Term Radiopacity and Surface Morphology of Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Materials. Materials. 2022 Sep; 15(19): 6635. doi: 10.3390/ma15196635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196635

Kandemir Demirci G, Çöven FO, Güneri P, Karavana SY, Nalbantsoy A et al. The Solubility, pH Value, Chemical Structure, Radiopacity, and Cytotoxicity of Four Different Root Canal Sealers: an in Vitro Study. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2023 Sep; 27(9): 5413-25. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05160-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05160-6

Azhar S, Agarwal A, Dhingra S, Akhtar MS, Yadav S, Sandesh S et al. Evaluation of Radiopacity of Calcium Silicate-Based and Resin-Based Materials Using Direct Digital Radiography Along with an Aluminium Step Wedge. Cureus. 2024 Sep; 16(9). doi: 10.7759/cureus.70035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.70035

Mert DB and Gençoğlu N. Evaluation of the Physical Properties of Different Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers. Bezmialem Science. 2024 May; 12(2): 224-230. doi: 10.14235/bas.galenos.2024.84429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14235/bas.galenos.2024.84429

Dželetović B, Milanović I, Antonijević Đ, Badnjar J, Petrov Z, Antić S et al. Radiopacity of Premixed and Two-Component Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers. Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine. 2022; 26(3): 161-6. doi: 10.5937/bjdm2203161D. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/bjdm2203161D

Sen HG, Helvacioglu-Yigit D, Yilmaz A. Radiopacity Evaluation of Calcium Silicate Cements. BioMed Central Oral Health. 2023 Jul; 23(1): 491. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w

Alamin MH, Yaghi SA, Al-Safi AF, Bouresly WR, Fakhruddin KS, Samaranayake LP et al. Comparative Analysis of Coronal Sealing Materials in Endodontics: Exploring Non-Eugenol Zinc Oxide-Based Versus Glass-Ionomer Cement Systems. European Journal of Dentistry. 2024 Oct; 18(04): 987-96. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782695

Malak AA, Masri YE, Al Ziab M, Zrara N, Baroud T, Salameh P. The Status of Clinical Trials Regarding Root Canal Sealers. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2024 Jan; 49(1). doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e5

Salama MT and Fulzele P. Study of Rheological Properties of Endodontic Sealers Used in Pediatric Dentistry. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health. 2025 Jan; 26(XXVI 2025): 1293-1298.

Singbal K, Pradeep P, Mangat AK. Comparative Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of Various Root Canal Sealers: An in Vitro Study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2025 Apr; 28(4): 325-30. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_866_24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_866_24

Jafari F and Jafari S. Composition and Physicochemical Properties of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Review Article. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2017 Oct; 9(10): e1249. doi: 10.4317/jced.54103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54103

Mendes AT, Silva PB, Só BB, Hashizume LN, Vivan RR, Rosa RA et al. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of New Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2018; 29: 536-40. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201802088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201802088

Zordan‐Bronzel CL, Tanomaru‐Filho M, Rodrigues EM, Chávez‐Andrade GM, Faria G, Guerreiro‐Tanomaru JM. Cytocompatibility, Bioactive Potential, and Antimicrobial Activity of an Experimental Calcium Silicate‐Based Endodontic Sealer. International Endodontic Journal. 2019 Jul; 52(7): 979-86. doi: 10.1111/iej.13086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13086

Teixeira AB, Vidal CL, Albiasetti T, de Castro DT, Dos Reis AC. Influence of Adding Nanoparticles of Silver Vanadate on Antibacterial Effect and Physicochemical Properties of Endodontic Sealers. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2019; 14(1): 7. doi: 10.1155/2019/4676354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4676354

Almeida LH, Moraes RR, Morgental RD, Pappen FG. Are Premixed Calcium Silicate–Based Endodontic Sealers Comparable to Conventional Materials? A Systematic Review of in Vitro Studies. Journal of Endodontics. 2017 Apr; 43(4): 527-35. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.019

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v7i8.3785
Published: 2026-08-31

How to Cite

Qureshi, S., Kalhoro, F. A., Oad, H., Panhwar, M. A., Manzoor, F., & Shujrah, F. A. (2026). Evaluation of Radiopacity of Endosequence Bio-ceramic Sealer and AH Plus by Digital Radiography: Radiopacity of Endosequence Bio-ceramic Sealer and AH Plus by Digital Radiography. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 7(8), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i8.3785

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)