Outcomes Following the Cutting Seton Procedure for High Anal Fistula

Cutting Seton Procedure for High Anal Fistula

Authors

  • Hasnain Khan Department of General Surgery, Medical Teaching Institute-Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Farrukh Ozair Shah Department of General Surgery, Medical Teaching Institute-Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Tilal Ahmed Raza Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Pilgrim Hospital, Boston, United Kingdom
  • Ayesha Mehmood Department of General Surgery, Maternal and Child Health Care Centre, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Nouman Khattak Department of General Surgery, Medical Teaching Institute-Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Ahsan Saleem Department of General Surgery, Medical Teaching Institute-Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • . Abdullah Department of General Surgery, Medical Teaching Institute-Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i3.3723

Keywords:

High Anal Fistula, Cutting Seton, Incontinence, Parks Incontinence Score

Abstract

Fistula in ano is a prevalent perianal condition caused by infection of the anal glands between the sphincter muscles, leading to substantial morbidity. It is reportedly more prevalent in males globally. Surgical management of high anal fistula remains challenging, and the cutting seton technique continues to be used as a treatment option. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes following the cutting seton procedure for high anal fistula. Methods: This cohort study was carried out at the Department of General Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, and involved 171 patients who were diagnosed with high anal fistula, and the cutting seton procedure was performed on them. The demographic data, clinical characteristics, and surgical outcomes were documented. The pain was rated with the help of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and recurrence and incontinence were recorded in the course of follow-up. The chi-square test was used, keeping p-value > 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The mean age of patients was 42.3 ± 11.4 years, with 60.8% being male. Postoperative pain was reported in 55.0% of patients. Recurrence occurred in 12.9%, and incontinence was observed in 18.1%, primarily to flatus. Stratification showed no significant associations between outcomes and demographic or clinical variables (p>0.05 for all). Conclusions: Seton is a safe and efficient intervention in high anal fistula, and results are satisfactory regardless of the demographics of patients and are largely dependent on the surgical approach and fistula features.

References

Sohrabi M, Bahrami S, Mosalli M, Khaleghian M, Obaidinia M. Perianal Fistula; From Etiology to Treatment-A Review. Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases. 2024 Apr; 16(2): 76. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2024.373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/mejdd.2024.373

Janugade HB, Tata NH, Ashar SM, Janugade DH, Kamboj P. A Clinico-Pathological Study of Fistula-in-Ano. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2016 Oct; 5(86): 6395-9. doi: 10.14260/Jemds/2016/1446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14260/Jemds/2016/1446

Hokkanen SR, Boxall N, Khalid JM, Bennett D, Patel H. Prevalence of Anal Fistula in the United Kingdom. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2019 Jul; 7(14): 1795. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i14.1795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i14.1795

Sarveazad A, Bahardoust M, Shamseddin J, Yousefifard M. Prevalence of Anal Fistulas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology and Hepatology from Bed to Bench. 2022; 15(1): 1.

Tan Z, Zhu S, Liu C, Meng Y, Li J, Zhang J, Dong W. Causal Link Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Fistula: Evidence from Mendelian Randomization Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023 Mar; 12(7): 2482. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072482

Garg P. Assessing Validity of Existing Fistula-in-Ano Classifications in a Cohort of 848 Operated and MRI-Assessed Anal Fistula Patients–Cohort Study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2020 Nov; 59: 122-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.022

Lu MY, Wang J, Wang ZC, Cai ZL, Liang N, Shi R. Diagnosis and Treatment for Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements. Frontiers in Surgery. 2025; 12: 1566130. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1566130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1566130

Hiremath SC and Patil R. Fistulotomy versus Fistulectomy for Fistula-in-Ano: A Randomized Prospective Study. The Surgery Journal. 2022 Oct; 8(04): e336-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758633

Haider SM and Abbas MH. Comparing Fistulotomy and Fistulectomy in Patients with Low-Lying Perianal Fistulae. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2025; 35(07): 14-18. doi: 10.29271/jcpsppg.2025.01.14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsppg.2025.01.14

Jafarzadeh J, Najibpoor N, Salmasi A. A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Rectal Advancement Flap and Seton Placement Surgeries in Patients with Anal Fistula on the Rate of Recurrence, Incontinence and Infection. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2019 Nov; 8(11): 3591-4. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_760_19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_760_19

Nazari H, Soltani ZE, Asbagh RA, Sharifi A, Badripour A, Tabasi AH et al. Advancing Standard Techniques for Treatment of Perianal Fistula: When Tissue Engineering Meets Seton. Health Sciences Review. 2022 Jun; 3: 100026. doi: 10.1016/j.hsr.2022.100026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hsr.2022.100026

Shirah BH and Shirah HA. The Impact of the Outcome of Treating A High Anal Fistula by Using a Cutting Seton and Staged Fistulotomy on Saudi Arabian Patients. Annals of Coloproctology. 2018 Oct; 34(5): 234. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.03.23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.03.23

Kadam P and Bhalerao S. Sample Size Calculation. International Journal of Ayurveda Research. 2010 Jan; 1(1): 55. doi: 10.4103/0974-7788.59946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7788.59946

Begum MR and Hossain MA. Validity and Reliability of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain Measurement. Journal of Medical Case Reports and Reviews. 2019; 2(11).

Khan KH. Effectiveness of Seton in Anal Fistula. Journal of Surgery Pakistan. 2019 May; 24(1): 8-12.

Bayrak M and Altintas Y. Predictive Factors Affecting Recurrence of Anal Fistula after LIFT Procedure. Age (Years). 2022 Nov; 38(8.9): 39-9.

Taskin AK, Akar M, Ozcetin B. Comparison of the Efficacy of Laser and Hybrid Seton Methods in the Treatment of Perianal Fistula. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan. 2024 Sep; 34(9): 1040-5. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.09.1040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.09.1040

Khan S, Kotcher R, Herman P, Wang L, Tessler R, Cunningham K et al. Predictors of Recurrence and Long-Term Patient Reported Outcomes Following Surgical Repair of Anal Fistula, A Retrospective Analysis. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2024 Mar; 39(1): 37. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04602-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04602-1

Amato A, Bottini C, De Nardi P, Giamundo P, Lauretta A, Realis Luc A et al. Evaluation and Management of Perianal Abscess and Anal Fistula: SICCR Position Statement. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2020 Feb; 24(2): 127-43. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02144-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02144-1

García-Olmo D, Gómez-Barrera M, De La Portilla F. Surgical Management of Complex Perianal Fistula Revisited in A Systematic Review: A Critical View of Available Scientific Evidence. BioMed Central Surgery. 2023 Feb; 23(1): 29. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01912-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01912-z

Shivakumar V, Jayarajah U, Samarasekera DN. Characteristics and Post-Operative Outcomes of Surgery for Fistula-in-Ano Managed at A Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka: A Retrospective Study. Journal of International Medical Research. 2023 Sep; 51(9): 03000605231194516. doi: 10.1177/03000605231194516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231194516

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v7i3.3723
Published: 2026-03-31

How to Cite

Khan, H., Shah, F. O., Raza, T. A., Mehmood, A., Khattak, N., Saleem, A., & Abdullah, . (2026). Outcomes Following the Cutting Seton Procedure for High Anal Fistula: Cutting Seton Procedure for High Anal Fistula. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 7(3), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v7i3.3723

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit