Histopathological Diversity in Hysterectomy Specimens at Jinnah Sindh Medical University Lab

Histopathological Diversity in Hysterectomy Specimens

Authors

  • Mubashira Adnan Department of Pathology, Sindh Medical College, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Wajid Hussain Department of Pathology, United Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Yawar Abbas Zaidi Department of Pathology, Sindh Medical College, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Faiza Zeeshan Department of Pathology, Sindh Medical College, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Binish Arif Sultan Department of Pathology, Sindh Medical College, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Salma Parween Department of Pathology, National Institute of Child Health, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v6i7.3167

Keywords:

Hysterectomy, Histopathological Diversity, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Nabothian Cyst

Abstract

Hysterectomy is common but often overused in Pakistan, with rising cases in cities like Dera Ghazi Khan. Fibroids and abnormal uterine bleeding are the top causes, though many effective non-surgical treatments exist. Experts urge prioritizing medical management and preserving fertility through alternatives like myomectomy before resorting to surgery. Objective: To determine the spectrum of hysterectomies’ lesions in histopathological analysis at Jinnah Sind Medical University Lab (JSMU lab). Method: This retrospective study was conducted in the setting of the JSMU diagnostic lab in Karachi, from January 2023 to December 2024. The sample size included the hysterectomy samples received during the two years mentioned before. The sampling technique was non-probability consecutive sampling. A proforma was designed to collect data from the records of the JSMU lab. This included the age of the patients, Indication of surgery, and outcome/diagnosis after histopathological examinations. Results: This study included 147 hysterectomies with a mean age of 44.11 years, and the Individuals aged between 40 and 49 years comprised the largest proportion, making up half of the total participants. Heavy menstrual bleeding was the most frequent clinical finding, present in 44% of cases. Histopathologically, 50% of cases showed leiomyoma, followed by adenomyosis, with almost all patients having chronic cervicitis and nabothian cysts. Conclusions: It was concluded that hysterectomy was most common in women aged 40–49 years, primarily for heavy menstrual bleeding. Leiomyoma was the leading histopathological finding, followed by adenomyosis, with chronic cervicitis and nabothian cysts in most cases.

References

Anbreen F, Qadir S, Naeem H, Farhat N, Ghafoor M, Hassan S. Type, time-trend and indications of hysterectomy. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018 Dec; 16(4): 92-6. doi: 10.46903/gjms/16.04.1958.

Wright JD, Huang Y, Li AH, Melamed A, Hershman DL. Nationwide estimates of annual inpatient and outpatient hysterectomies performed in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022 Mar; 139(3): 446-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004679.

Naseeb S, Dossal A, Rashid S. An Audit of Hysterectomy at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. Journal of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Pakistan. 2021 Jun; 11(2): 95-9.

Don EE, Mijatovic V, Huirne JA. Infertility in patients with uterine fibroids: a debate about the hypothetical mechanisms. Human Reproduction. 2023 Nov; 38(11): 2045-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead194.

Mension E, Calaf J, Chapron C, Dolmans MM, Donnez J, Marcellin L et al. An update on the management of uterine fibroids: personalized medicine or guidelines? Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders. 2024 Sep; 7: 100080. doi: 10.1016/j.jeud.2024.100080.

Vitale SG, Della Corte L, Ciebiera M, Carugno J, Riemma G, Lasmar RB et al. Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation: from indications to instrumentation and techniques—a call to action. Diagnostics. 2023 Jan; 13(3): 339. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030339.

Davis E and Sparzak PB. Abnormal uterine bleeding [Updated 2023 Sep 4]. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing. 2024.

Fergusson RJ, Rodriguez MB, Lethaby A, Farquhar C. Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019 Aug; 8. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000329.pub3.

Cruz SD, Santos VC, Nunes EF, Rodrigues CN. Sexual Function and Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women Submitted to Total Hysterectomy with Bilateral Oophorectomy. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa. 2020 Apr; 27: 28-33. doi: 10.1590/1809-2950/18033627012020.

Forsgren C, Amato M, Johannesson U. Effects of Hysterectomy On Pelvic Floor Function and Sexual Function—A Prospective Cohort Study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2022 Oct; 101(10): 1048-56. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14437.

Ekanayake C, Pathmeswaran A, Herath R, Wijesinghe P. Vaginal, Sexual and Urinary Symptoms Following Hysterectomy: A Multi-Centre Randomized Controlled Trial. Women's Midlife Health. 2020 Mar; 6(1): 1. doi: 10.1186/s40695-020-0049-2.

Erdoğan E, Demir S, Çalışkan BB, Bayrak NG. Effect of Psychological Care Given to the Women Who Underwent Hysterectomy Before and After the Surgery on Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety and the Body Image Levels. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020 Oct; 40(7): 981-7. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1678574.

Sharara FI, Kheil MH, Feki A, Rahman S, Klebanoff JS, Ayoubi JM et al. Current and Prospective Treatment of Adenomyosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021 Jul; 10(15): 3410. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153410.

Stratopoulou CA, Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Conservative Management of Uterine Adenomyosis: Medical Vs. Surgical Approach. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021 Oct; 10(21): 4878. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214878.

Uwais A, Al-Abadleh A, Jahameh M, Satari A, Al-Hawamdeh Q, Haddadin S. A Comparison Between Total Abdominal Hysterectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy. 2024 Jan; 13(1): 43-7. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_72_23.

Ciebiera M, Madueke-Laveaux OS, Feduniw S, Ulin M, Spaczyński R, Zgliczyńska M et al. GnRH Agonists and Antagonists in Therapy of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids–Current Roles and Future Perspectives. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2023 Nov; 24(16): 1799-809. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2248890.

Donnez J, Squifflet J, Polet R, Nisolle M. Laparoscopic Myolysis. Human Reproduction Update. 2000 Nov; 6(6): 609-13. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.6.609.

Ng AP, Sanaiha Y, Bakhtiyar SS, Ebrahimian S, Branche C, Benharash P. National analysis of cost disparities in robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic abdominal operations. Surgery. 2023 Jun; 173(6): 1340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.016.

Davis AA. Unindicated Hysterectomies in India: The Aftermath. British Medical Journal Case Reports CP. 2019 Dec; 12(12): e230129. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-230129.

Khandelwal S. Comprehending Unwanted Hysterectomies in Developing Nations: An Analysis of Women’s Decision-Making Processes, Underlying Causes, and Subsequent Consequences. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2024 Nov; 86(11): 6404-6. doi: 10.1097/MS9.000000000000264

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pjhs.v6i7.3167
Published: 2025-07-31

How to Cite

Adnan, M., Hussain, W., Zaidi, Y. A., Zeeshan, F., Sultan, B. A., & Parween, S. (2025). Histopathological Diversity in Hysterectomy Specimens at Jinnah Sindh Medical University Lab: Histopathological Diversity in Hysterectomy Specimens . Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 6(7), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v6i7.3167

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)